I've read it doesn't have the most amazing keybed ever, but I'm sure it'll work better than my Midiplus i61 which doesn't have proper aftertouch, anyway. I did a talking drum on mine that's damn close to the real thing. This also means that memory is lost on power down. I guess I have tiny hands. For the price it was a great piece of equipment. The keybed really is pretty good.
That little keyboard is embarrasing. That way, you can leave the yewknit on all year. A further limitation was the lack of separate outputs. The presets are typical of those found on other Japanese poly-synths of the time- bright, bland but with one or two gems. Rating: 3 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:37 Jeremiah M. Even sampling the basic single cycle oscillator waveforms provides some very useful raw timbres that provide plenty of scope for a sampler with a good synthesis engine. This isn't a powerhouse synth, but I've gotten some nice timbres which remind me of 80's synthpop esp.
I found this particularly the case with some percussive sounds, or sounds with a fast attack. I did have one key sticking on it for a while, but I opened the synth up and it went away, and has never come back. I would power it on batteries and use the guitar strap for mobility and that retro-80's look. I'm not saying that the bass isnt large. For the waveforms with narrow spectra, like the so-called ringing resonant waveforms, the frequency of the ring increases as the wave-shaper opens, just like a resonant or bandpass filter. A value of 99 is the fastest rate or highest level, a value of 0 is the slowest rate or lowest level. But I think, with a few little tweaks- better waveforms, 8 stage envelopes six of them! The files section has manuals in pdf format.
It would be nice to have one for each section, but the envelopes make up for this shortcoming in most situations. One was built for IsaoTomita but it never went into mass production. Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:37. I assume maybe the lid was putting pressure on the key or something, but since the issue is gone, I never really dug in further. Definitely one of my favorites! De Furia, Steve ; Scaccaferro, Joe.
The basic waveforms are certainly bright, but they are not as harmonically rich as the Casio. This is an extra layer in the patch hierarchy, allowing storage of layers, splits and multitimbral performances. Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Sunday-Jan-02-2000 at 04:57 Milkish a professional user from New York City writes: I love this little guy. Miles for the book The history of the cosmosynth and patches to download. As with any electronics repair job, it is sensible to ensure that you have a large and tidy work area, otherwise you will loose screws! It is also a good idea to photograph each stage so that you can put everything back where it belongs. Programming is very difficult even if you use a computer editor. Most sounds will give you weird phased flickering noises at the bottom registers that are large sounding, but turn of and on.
It doesn't really have much bottom-end bass just turns into fuzz , but it's great for lead-lines and bizarre noises. A lot wetterer than my minimoog. Although that doesn't really sound like an oxidation issue. Sounds with complex envelopes can occasionally be awkward, requiring more multi-samples. It definitely does not feel cheap. Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Sunday-Jun-27-1999 at 11:58 Arp a part-timer user from England writes: A great little synth that is incredibly cheap. If you are the manufacturer or developer of a commercial product, please message the mods before posting, but we will usually allow new product promotion as long as you stay to answer questions.
The same cartridge will hold 32 sounds on the 5000 and 3000, but unfortunately these cannot be accessed directly. Regarding the synth itself: Not very personal or expressive, it's extremely digital in every aspect but so much fun! There is no global cutoff setting, apart from whatever levels you choose in the envelope. I gotta open it up and clean it sometime. Overall it's sounds were a simi-fat synthy sound. Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Sunday-Feb-17-2002 at 13:49 Charlie from Sweden writes: A cheap machine. Use it all the time Live. Great for working on the move! Roland and Yamaha have been around for so long because they have always carefully built on past successes.
But mine I think is broken. Not to mention I got it for eighty dollars! Our formerly most reliable one finally crapped out. Posts lacking a comment will be removed at the moderators discretion. This method had the potential for more complex sounds, but combined with a very poor user interface were very frustrating synths to use. The built in chorus is your friend.
It doesn't have a proper filter, but of the waveforms you have to play with a couple have built-in resonance which can simulate a filter sweep. Common problems are failed displays and minor power supply issues- 101s often cannot be powered from batteries. Improving the sound The service manual is very good. It's way easier to program than most of the digital synths that I've seen from the eighties; no cryptic menues to dig through, and most of the parameters are reached with one or two buttons. September 2006: First web version completed.
So much for what it sounds like- in actual fact, the resonant waves are generated by adjusting the tuning of two synchronised sine waves, with some additional processing to remove the noise that this generates. Some superb bass lead and guitar chop type sounds can be achieved. A good way to get those strange sounds that no human could possibly intentionally create. Only the volatile preset memory which erases itself swiftly , and the relatively high noise level go against it. Somehow it's rewarding to spend some time to find some excellent sounds in something so toylike in appearance - lots of untapped potential under the hood if the time's invested. This is not the natural state of the instrument. .